[ofa-general] OFED-1.3beta IPoIB testing questions
Eli Cohen
eli at dev.mellanox.co.il
Sun Dec 2 05:45:59 PST 2007
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 15:28 -0800, Shirley Ma wrote:
> I just touch tested ofed-1.3 beta IPoIB. And found there was a kernel
> parameter hw_csum being added in IPoIB. I have several questions here:
> 1. Why not using ethtool to set up these HW_CSUM flags?
There is no adequate interface in Ethtool for doing it so we use a
module parameter. This is because we see this as a static configuration
per host.
> 2. I haven't looked at the detailed code yet, is that possible with this
> flag, TCP/IP will not do CSUM for HCA which has no TCP/IP offload support?
Yes, the HCA need not have checksum offload support. the idea is the IB
ICRC provides the insurance that the packets are not corrupt.
> If so, then these packets should be limited to be IB network. Routing to
> ethernet network, the packets would be dropped. If not, I tested IPoIB-UD,
> why I saw 30% improvement with hw_csum set in none connectX mthca SDR
> environment?
> 3. I saw switching between IPoIB-cm and IPoIB-ud corrupted interface IP
> address (unicast address, subnet mask, broadcast address. Anybody saw the
> same problem?
I did not notice this but it happened to me a few times that when I
wanted to change the mtu and forgot to specify "mtu" in if config, then
ifconfig interpreted the mtu as the IP address and ended up in a wrong
IP address.
>
> Thanks
> Shirley
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
More information about the general
mailing list