[ofa-general] IPoIB CQ overrun
Chris Elmquist
chrise at sgi.com
Tue Dec 4 07:50:07 PST 2007
On Tuesday (12/04/2007 at 05:15PM +0200), Eli Cohen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 17:40 -0800, akepner at sgi.com wrote:
>
> > Looking at the contents of the CQ context table (right after the
> > overrun at 15:50:53), do the producer and consumer indices look
> > reasonable? I expected to find that producer_index + 1 == consumer_index.
>
> I am not sure the value you get in the query for the consumer index
> reflects exactly what the consumer actually polled. I am checking with
> our FW team.
> Where you able to reproduce this on a system with less nodes?
It seems to be very difficult to reproduce when the node count is
small. I am not sure we have yet. On the other hand, very large
node counts make it real obvious.
Chris
--
Chris Elmquist mailto:chrise at sgi.com (651)683-3093
Silicon Graphics, Inc. Eagan, MN
More information about the general
mailing list