[ofa-general] [PATCH] IB/CM: add support for routed paths
Hal Rosenstock
hrosenstock at xsigo.com
Tue Dec 11 10:50:01 PST 2007
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 09:12 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
> > Could the subnet local component(s) in the REQ be used on the passive
> > side instead of permissive LIDs ? That might be more "standard" than
> > using permissive LIDs.
>
> It could be used. I wanted this to work on the passive side if the LIDs
> were set correctly in the REQ.
By correctly, do you mean set to permissive in the REQ ?
Guess I don't see much difference (on the passive side) in checking the
LIDs for permissive or the subnet local field to determine whether to
use the LIDs from the LRH. The only difference is this additional
special meaning to the permissive LIDs.
-- Hal
>
> - Sean
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
More information about the general
mailing list