[ofa-general] peer to peer connections support
Kanevsky, Arkady
Arkady.Kanevsky at netapp.com
Tue Dec 18 06:54:10 PST 2007
I think we need at least timeout parameter for accept.
One way to handle it is to include it into rdma_conn_param.
That way it can be used for both sides and not change to function
signatures.
But you would still need to recompile.
Thanks,
Arkady Kanevsky email: arkady at netapp.com
Network Appliance Inc. phone: 781-768-5395
1601 Trapelo Rd. - Suite 16. Fax: 781-895-1195
Waltham, MA 02451 central phone: 781-768-5300
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:ogerlitz at voltaire.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 5:37 AM
> To: Sean Hefty; OpenFabrics General; Jeff Squyres (jsquyres);
> Jon Mason
> Subject: [ofa-general] peer to peer connections support
>
> Hi Sean,
>
> I wonder what will it take to implement peer to peer
> connection establishment support in the IB CM (and RDMA-CM,
> ofcourse). Also do you expect any API changes needed in order
> to support that?
>
> Reading through section 12.10.4, I was not sure to fully
> understand the
> following: "The ServiceID implicitly defines whether the
> service is client/server or peer to peer, but the application
> must inform the CM so that the CM will handle the inbound REQ
> correctly."
>
> Such support would be useful in symmetric schemes such as
> MPIs that open connections on demand and more applications
> where each party can both accept and initiate connections.
> For example, I understand that some work is done now at the
> open mpi community to use the rdma-cm as a possible channel
> for connection establishment.
>
> Or.
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
More information about the general
mailing list