[openib-general] new IB CM reject reason

[James Lentini]

On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Sean Hefty wrote:

> > And my claim is that you should define private data format to go with this
> > other reason otherwise you are not really solving the problem.
> 
> This is not a consumer issued reject.  It is a CM issued reject, so 
> the private data is ignored.  This is no different than several 
> other reject reasons (like invalid service ID).  At best we could 
> define the ARI, but if we knew what the contents of the ARI should 
> be, then we should use a more specific reject reason than 'other'.

Invalid Service ID (8) appears to be an appropriate Reason value for 
the case when a REQ is received for a service ID that is not 
registered with the CM (either because the application crashed or 
exited on its own accord).

I agree that if the reason codes are insufficient we should take this 
up in the IBTA.