[openib-general] how to handle OFEd 1.2 bugs in bugzilla

[Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)]

Yes, I'd like to add alpha1, etc. version numbers in bugzilla.

For existing bugs, the Reporter and Assignee should try to
communicate/negotiate Priority/Severity.  For bugs in areas that Cisco
supports, I review the bugs and try to ask for desired ones to be fixed.
I was happy with the responses I got for OFED 1.1 from Mellanox and Open
MPI.

If you want a bug scrub, I suggest a distributed one, where someone from
each company scrubs the bugs in areas they are responsible for.

Scott 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tziporet Koren [mailto:tziporet at mellanox.co.il] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 6:18 AM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Cc: EWG; OPENIB
> Subject: how to handle OFEd 1.2 bugs in bugzilla
> 
> Hi Scott and all,
> I wish to consult with you in the way we will treat OFED 1.2 bugs in 
> bugzilla.
> 
> 1. Do we want to have 1.2-alpha 1.2-beta, 1.2-rcX in version, or just 
> 1.2 as we have now
> 2. What do we wish to do with bugs that were opened for 1.1 and are 
> still open?
> 3. What to do with old bugs that where open to gen2 in general?
> 4. What is our methodology for priority and severity setup? 
> (There are 
> too many  blocker bugs still open in OFED 1.1 so they are not 
> actually 
> blockers or they were fixed but not updated)
> 
> Thanks,
> Tziporet
>