[openib-general] IPv6oIB neighbour discover broken when MCGs overflow

[Roland Dreier]

 > Sure but I think this complicates the SL2VL tables in the subnet to
 > accomodate this. I think a similar thing is true for PKeys. So to me
 > this is an SM complexity issue when mapping multiple MGRPs to same MLID.

I'm still confused.  Aren't SL2VL and P_Key tables completely
orthogonal from forwarding tables?  Obviously there's no problem using
multiple different SLs or P_Keys to reach the same endport using the
same LID, so I don't understand why MLIDs would be different.

 - R.