[openib-general] [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes
Roland Dreier
rdreier at cisco.com
Thu Jan 4 13:34:27 PST 2007
OK, I'm back from vacation today.
Anyway I don't have a definitive statement on this right now. I guess
I agree that I don't like having an extra parameter to a function that
should be pretty fast (although req notify isn't quite as hot as
something like posting a send request or polling a cq), given that it
adds measurable overhead. (And I am surprised that the overhead is
measurable, since 3 arguments still fit in registers, but OK).
I also agree that adding an extra entry point just to pass in the user
data is ugly, and also racy.
Giving the kernel driver a pointer it can read seems OK I guess,
although it's a little ugly to have a backdoor channel like that.
I'm somewhat surprised the driver has to go into the kernel to rearm a
CQ -- what makes the operation need kernel privileges? (Sorry for not
reading the code)
More information about the general
mailing list