[openib-general] ib_dma_addr_t
Roland Dreier
rdreier at cisco.com
Thu Jan 4 13:50:04 PST 2007
> I'd like to propose that we introduce ib_dma_addr_t.
> The idea is to add some type safety (via sparse checker)
> that we lost when all addresses were converted to u64.
How would that work? sparse isn't going to warn about implicit casts
to/from ib_dma_addr_t, is it? We can't make ib_dma_addr_t a bitwise
type, because arithmetic is allowed on bus addresses.
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list