[openib-general] some IB multicast sendonly thoughts
Hal Rosenstock
halr at voltaire.com
Tue Jan 16 09:42:40 PST 2007
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 12:31, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> > Or Gerlitz wrote:
> >> Eitan Zahavi wrote:
>
> >> So you are saying that the GW **has** to listen on IGMP at the Eth
> >> side and **has** to do IB SA join in the only way that forces the SA
> >> to create the group --> FullMember ?
>
> > Yes
>
> >> If indeed, this is kind of bad,
>
> > I find it very reasonable
>
> OK, going fwd with this approach, the GW got IGMP --> so it did FULL
> MEMBER join and the group is created, what is going on when the Eth
> multicast node stopped doing RX is there a "leave" IGMP which the GW can
> trap and act?
Leave is supported in IGMPv2 and v3. v1 only had reports so the host(s)
would need to be polled in that case.
-- Hal
> Or.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
More information about the general
mailing list