[ofa-general] Re: Re: IPoIB-CM UC mode

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

> Quoting Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz at voltaire.com>:
> Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: Re: IPoIB-CM UC mode
> 
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> 
> >I don't see why are you trying to get rid of keepalives.
> >With RC we currently have an arbitrary ACK timeout, and this
> >is no different, and quite easy to implement.
> 
> Since we agree (?) that RC is bad for IPoIB-CM and I want to find a way 
> for a UC based implementation to avoid implementing a dedicated keep 
> alive protocol.
> 
> As for all your other comments, I need to think more, will get back to 
> it later this week.

Not sure it's worth the effort: just scanning the list of active connections
once in a while and sending a LAP message seems easy enough.

-- 
MST