[ofa-general] Re: Re: IPoIB-CM UC mode
    Tziporet Koren 
    tziporet at dev.mellanox.co.il
       
    Tue Jul  3 11:36:11 PDT 2007
    
    
  
Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> we should move to UC
>>
>> For HW that supports UC with SRQ, yes.
>
> Dror did not mention the HW, my understanding is that this aspect is 
> fine... now, assuming the need for liveness protocol is behind us, and 
> if not, it can be implemented as you suggested. the problem is  
> narrowed to have the FW support SRQ/UC.
We still don't have a solid plan for this in the FW
Tziporet
    
    
More information about the general
mailing list