[ofa-general] is ipath_layer.c dead code?
    Roland Dreier 
    rdreier at cisco.com
       
    Fri Jul 20 20:32:52 PDT 2007
    
    
  
thanks, applied.  I did indeed miss the header file being dead too.
BTW...
 > The failed attempt to get ipath_ether upstream was the final nail in the coffin
I don't think that the attempt to get ipath_ether upstream was ever
that vigorous -- I don't see much demand for it, but if you guys feel
that it has advantages for users then I wouldn't rule out merging it.
 - R.
    
    
More information about the general
mailing list