[ofa-general] ANNOUNCE ofed backports for 2.6.22 kernel bits
Sean Hefty
sean.hefty at intel.com
Tue Jul 24 09:09:35 PDT 2007
>at qlogic we now keep the backports as branches in
>our git tree and this, i find, is much easier to
>handle. because:
>
>* viewing and navigating backport source becomes
> _much_ easier.
>* merges are easier -- patches are much more fragile
> than branches.
>* comparisons are easier -- checking for differences
> between backports and between a backport and the
> canonical source is faster and more convenient...
>* changesets are readable. trying to decipher diffs
> to patches is medically proven to take months, if not
> years, off your life.
Let's add that you don't need patches to patches, and the order patches are
applied isn't determined alphabetically.
>anyway, what do you think? is there anyway i could
>convince you to dump the backport patches and put
>all the backports in branches? i'm willing to do the
>legwork if you see value...
I would love OFED to dump the patch directory concept.
- Sean
More information about the general
mailing list