[ofa-general] installing 1.2-GA on Redhat EL5

Suresh Shelvapille suri at baymicrosystems.com
Wed Jul 25 09:54:04 PDT 2007


Doug:

I had ofed-1.2-rc1 installed on a server running redhat el5. I am trying to upgrade the
release to ofed-1.2-GA. The build finished and the install gives me this error:


--------------

Installing OFED software into /usr/local/ofed_1.2

Running /bin/rpm -ihv --force --nodeps
/root/ofed_1.2-GA/OFED-1.2-20070626-0917/RPMS/redhat-release-5Server-5.0.0.9/kernel-ib-1.2-2.6.18_8.el5.x86_64.rpm
/root/ofed_1.2-GA/OFED-1.2-20070626-0917/RPMS/redhat-release-5Server-5.0.0.9/kernel-ib-devel-1.2-2.6.18_8.el5.x86_64.rpm
|
ERROR: Failed executing "/bin/rpm -ihv --force --nodeps
/root/ofed_1.2-GA/OFED-1.2-20070626-0917/RPMS/redhat-release-5Server-5.0.0.9/kernel-ib-1.2-2.6.18_8.el5.x86_64.rpm
/root/ofed_1.2-GA/OFED-1.2-20070626-0917/RPMS/redhat-release-5Server-5.0.0.9/kernel-ib-devel-1.2-2.6.18_8.el5.x86_64.rpm
"

-------------------

Any ideas...


Thanks,
Suri


> -----Original Message-----
> From: general-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:general-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf
> Of Sean Hefty
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 8:23 PM
> To: Yevgeny Kliteynik
> Cc: OpenIB
> Subject: Re: [ofa-general] QoS RFC
> 
> > 2.5. ULPs that use CM interface (like SRP) should have their own
> > pre-assigned Service-ID and use it while obtaining PR/MPR for
> > establishing connections. The SA receiving the PR/MPR should match it
> > against the policy and return the appropriate PR/MPR including SL,
> > MTU and RATE.
> 
> We need to ensure that this can work without pre-assigned service IDs,
> or at least service IDs that are assigned within a fairly wide range,
> such as locally assigned IDs.
> 
> > 2.6. ULPs and programs using CMA to establish RC connection should
> > provide the CMA the target IP and Service-ID. Some of the ULPs might
> > also provide QoS-Class (E.g. for SDP sockets that are provided the
> > TOS socket option). The CMA should then use the provided Service-ID
> > and optional QoS-Class and pass them in the PR/MPR request. The
> > resulting PR/MPR should be used for configuring the connection QP.
> 
> The interface to the CMA needs to remain as transport independent as
> possible, and I am unsure of the transport independence of tying QoS to
> the destination port number.  (I'm not disagreeing; I'm just not sure at
> the moment it's the right approach.)
> 
> > PathRecord and MultiPathRecord enhancement for QoS: As mentioned
> > above the PathRecord and MultiPathRecord attributes should be
> > enhanced to carry the Service-ID which is a 64bit value, which has
> > been standardized by the IBTA. A new field QoS-Class is also
> > provided. A new capability bit should describe the SM QoS support in
> > the SA class port info. This approach provides an easy migration path
> > for existing access layer and ULPs by not introducing new set of
> > PR/MPR attribute.
> 
> Has any thought been given to how to make this scale?
> 
> > 5. CMA features ----------------
> >
> > The CMA interface supports Service-ID through the notion of port
> > space as a prefixes to the port_num which is part of the sockaddr
> > provided to rdma_resolve_add(). What is missing is the explicit
> > request for a QoS-Class that should allow the ULP (like SDP) to
> > propagate a specific request for a class of service. A mechanism for
> > providing the QoS-Class is available in the IPv6 address, so we could
> > use that address field. Another option is to implement a special
> > connection options API for CMA.
> >
> > Missing functionality by CMA is the usage of the provided QoS-Class
> > and Service-ID in the sent PR/MPR. When a response is obtained it is
> > an existing requirement for the CMA to use the PR/MPR from the
> > response in setting up the QP address vector.
> 
> The most natural function to specify additional QoS parameters would be
> rdma_resolve_route.
> 
> - Sean
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
> 
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general




More information about the general mailing list