[ofa-general] IB performance stats (revisited)
Hal Rosenstock
halr at voltaire.com
Wed Jun 27 14:02:09 PDT 2007
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:23, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > so I guess these guys are poor citizens as well...
> >
> > Not sure what you mean.
> >
> > > the real issue as I see it then means nobody can trust the data if
> > > randon tools randomly reset the counters. a real shame...
>
> In IBADM ibmon we worked around this issue by inspecting the fact the
> counter value decreases without the ibmon knowledge.
That is detected in the current PerfMgr as well: it is an "out of band"
clear. The question is the loss of data accuracy from the last snapshot
to the new lower values.
-- Hal
> >
> > I consider this to be a real rather than random app for this.
> > Guess it depends on what one considers random.
> >
> > -- Hal
> >
> > > -mark
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > general mailing list
> > general at lists.openfabrics.org
> > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
> >
> > To unsubscribe, please visit
> > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> >
More information about the general
mailing list