[ofa-general] Re: Re: Re: Is ibv_get_async_event() a blocking call ?

[Or Gerlitz]

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> Quoting Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz at voltaire.com>:
>> Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: Re: Re: Is ibv_get_async_event() a blocking call ?
>>
>> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> upon a completion event, if a completion event for the same
>>> CQ is outstanding, we can discard the new one as it does not
>>> add new information.
>> I think you have replaced completion events with async events and event 
>> channel (queue) with completion queue. There is no issue with CQ getting 
>> bigger and bigger etc.
> 
> I'm sorry I could not parse this. We are worried about event channels
> taking up to much memory. What I am pointing out is that we never need
> to have two events for the same CQ in the same channel.

 From your original post i could not understand this is what you want to 
say.

Or.