[ofa-general] Re: [openib-general] [ofw] [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re:winrelated[was:Re:[PATCH 1/2] opensm: sigusr1: syslog() fixes]]]
Sasha Khapyorsky
sashak at voltaire.com
Sun Mar 25 00:38:18 PDT 2007
On 21:18 Sat 24 Mar , Tzachi Dar wrote:
> After some more checks, and given the limited time that I had for this,
> I'm afraid that I wasn't able to find a way to do that. Do you have any
> idea of how this can be done?
I think that using one of the ready pthread for windows implementations
could be more optimal way.
However if you still prefer a "wrapper" solution I found this article,
this describes pthread_cond_wait() implementation issue, guess it is
potentially hardest part of such wrapper. Hope it is useful.
http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/win32-cv-1.html
Sasha
>
> Thanks
> Tzachi
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sasha Khapyorsky [mailto:sashak at voltaire.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 3:42 PM
> > To: Tzachi Dar
> > Cc: Hal Rosenstock; ofw at lists.openfabrics.org; Gilad Shainer;
> > OPENIB; Fab Tillier
> > Subject: Re: [openib-general] [ofw] [Fwd: Re: [Fwd:
> > Re:winrelated[was:Re:[PATCH 1/2] opensm: sigusr1: syslog() fixes]]]
> >
> > Hi Tzahi,
> >
> > On 18:56 Wed 21 Feb , Tzachi Dar wrote:
> > >
> > > To be on the practical side, I have read the introduction
> > to pthreads
> > > in the past and from what I saw it was relatively easy to implement
> > > that on Win32. I want to look at the functions that were mentioned
> > > before in this thread and see if that is still the case.
> > >
> > > Let me get back to you on this at the beginning of next week.
> >
> > Any news here? Thanks.
> >
> > Sasha
> >
More information about the general
mailing list