[ofa-general] Re: pkey change handling patch

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

> Quoting Roland Dreier <rdreier at cisco.com>:
> Subject: Re: pkey change handling patch
> 
>     Michael> I looked at cache.c and you are right. Maybe we should
>     Michael> either 1. report events after cache has been updated or
>     Michael> 2. make cache queries error out (EBUSY?) if cache hs not
>     Michael> updated yet.
> 
>     Michael> Option 1 requires core changes, option 2 - ULP changes
> 
>     Michael> I would be inclined to go for 2.  Roland?
> 
> Yes, I agree.  How about ESTALE as an error code?

Looks OK.
Moni, I think this should be a separate patch,
and your pkey work on top of this.

-- 
MST