[ofa-general] minutes from socket over RDMA discussion at workshop
Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
sweitzen at cisco.com
Tue May 1 21:48:26 PDT 2007
No, this is not right. SDP has better latency and better throughput
than IPoIB CM, but also uses more CPU.
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
________________________________
From: general-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org
[mailto:general-bounces at lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Kanevsky,
Arkady
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 9:39 PM
To: openib-general
Subject: [ofa-general] minutes from socket over RDMA discussion
at workshop
Dear,
group enclosed is the discussion we had at Sonoma workshop.
Here are rough minutes.
We had not tried submission SDP to kernel.org.
The current SDP performance is not very good.
IPOIB connection mode has much better bandwidth.
But SDP has better latency and less overhead.
IPOIB connection mode scalability was not stressed yet.
What are API requirements?
Socket over RDMA sounds like RDS for financial services.
Thanks,
Arkady Kanevsky email: arkady at netapp.com
Network Appliance Inc. phone: 781-768-5395
1601 Trapelo Rd. - Suite 16. Fax: 781-895-1195
Waltham, MA 02451 central phone: 781-768-5300
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20070501/9f3d5907/attachment.html>
More information about the general
mailing list