[ofa-general] Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI over ofed udapl - bugs opened

[Andrew Friedley]

Steve Wise wrote:
>> I hope you guys are documenting this in a way that makes this issue 
>> extremely clear to both uDAPL and OFA verbs (is this the right naming?) 
>> users.  Maybe it's been done already, but is it possible to emit some 
>> sort of loud warning/error when the accept()'ing side tries to send 
>> before a receive?
>>
> 
> The connection comes tumbling down.  How's that for loud? :)

works :)

> Seriously though, it isn't documented well enough.  But we're bleeding
> edge here. And I'm still hoping somebody will come up with an elegant
> solution that doesn't break interoperability, applications and/or iwarp
> hw (i'm a dreamer :). 

Well, if documenting it once saves someone a headache and a few hours of 
their time, it's probably worth it.

Seems like everyone understands now what the problem is, that it sucks, 
and it can't be fixed lower down the stack :)  Thanks for explaining 
Caitlin/Steve.  As Jeff wrote, dealing with it in the BTLs really won't 
be that hard, just makes things a little more complicated to maintain.

Andrew