[ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Feedback on Developer's Summit

[Or Gerlitz]

Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > For (B): the LRO implementation posted is exactly using the generic
>  > network stack software LRO helpers!
> 
> Sorry, I take that back.  I just checked again, and the patch that was
> posted just used the same function names as the upstream LRO generic
> helpers, which is what confused me when I skimmed it.
> 
> Yes, clearly we want to use the inet_lro stuff; I don't think there's
> anything to discuss about that.

OK, fine.

So the way this patch is present in OFED 1.3 is only temporal where the 
upstream code would be done differently, let it be.

Or.