[ofa-general] IBV_WC_STATUS status set as 135
Bharath Ramesh
bramesh at vt.edu
Wed Nov 7 10:42:45 PST 2007
I can always reproduce the by creating the race condition. I am trying to
hit a deadline this week. I will try to create a test code that reproduces
the same which you can run to test it. I will have it to you hopefully by
the weekend.
Bharath
-----Original Message-----
From: Roland Dreier [mailto:rdreier at cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 1:09 PM
To: Bharath Ramesh
Cc: OFA-General
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] IBV_WC_STATUS status set as 135
> I think the problem that was my SRQ buffer was hitting low watermark and
> before I could post additional buffers to the SRQ my QP was going into >
an error state, a race condition that I had missed.
There's still something fishy -- I don't see how ibv_poll_cq() could ever
set wc.status to 135. Do you understand why you weren't getting a valid
error code?
- R.
More information about the general
mailing list