[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] opensm: fix PortInfo update issues.
Hal Rosenstock
hrosenstock at xsigo.com
Mon Nov 12 13:40:25 PST 2007
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 23:09 +0200, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> This fixes PortInfo update issues:
> - handle switch's port 0 (esp0 in link_mgr) as end port
> - remove check which is always FALSE (since *p_pi = *p_old_pi)
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com>
> ---
> opensm/opensm/osm_lid_mgr.c | 22 ++--------------------
> opensm/opensm/osm_link_mgr.c | 13 ++-----------
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_lid_mgr.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_lid_mgr.c
> index d25605f..076d0e9 100644
> --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_lid_mgr.c
> +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_lid_mgr.c
> @@ -959,15 +959,9 @@ __osm_lid_mgr_set_physp_pi(IN osm_lid_mgr_t * const p_mgr,
> */
>
> memset(payload, 0, IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE);
> -
> - /* Correction by FUJITSU */
> - if (port_num != 0)
> - memcpy(payload, p_old_pi, sizeof(ib_port_info_t));
> + memcpy(payload, p_old_pi, sizeof(ib_port_info_t));
>
> /*
> - Correction following a bug injected by the previous
> - FUJITSU line:
> -
> Should never write back a value that is bigger then 3 in
> the PortPhysicalState field, so cannot simply copy!
>
> @@ -976,19 +970,7 @@ __osm_lid_mgr_set_physp_pi(IN osm_lid_mgr_t * const p_mgr,
> link down default state = polling
> port state - no change
> */
> - /* these values can be set only for ca ports, so if we are
> - on a switch node, set these values to zero */
> - if (osm_node_get_type(p_node) == IB_NODE_TYPE_SWITCH)
> - p_pi->state_info2 = 0x0;
> - else {
> - p_pi->state_info2 = 0x02;
> - /* Check to see if the value we are setting is different than
> - the value in the port_info. If it is, turn on send_set flag */
> - if (ib_port_info_get_link_down_def_state(p_pi) !=
> - ib_port_info_get_link_down_def_state(p_old_pi))
> - send_set = TRUE;
> - }
> -
> + p_pi->state_info2 = 0x02;
Isn't this a potential send_set change (as this could change LDDS) ?
> ib_port_info_set_port_state(p_pi, IB_LINK_NO_CHANGE);
>
> p_pi->m_key = p_mgr->p_subn->opt.m_key;
> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_link_mgr.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_link_mgr.c
> index b151c76..80e34b2 100644
> --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_link_mgr.c
> +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_link_mgr.c
> @@ -166,27 +166,19 @@ __osm_link_mgr_set_physp_pi(IN osm_link_mgr_t * const p_mgr,
> p_old_pi = &p_physp->port_info;
>
> memset(payload, 0, IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE);
> -
> - /* Correction by FUJITSU */
> memcpy(payload, p_old_pi, sizeof(ib_port_info_t));
>
> /*
> - Correction following a bug injected by the previous
> - FUJITSU line:
> -
> Should never write back a value that is bigger then 3 in
> the PortPhysicalState field - so can not simply copy!
>
> Actually we want to write there:
> port physical state - no change,
> link down default state = polling
> - port state - no change
> + port state - as requested.
> */
> p_pi->state_info2 = 0x02;
> - ib_port_info_set_port_state(p_pi, IB_LINK_NO_CHANGE);
> - if (ib_port_info_get_link_down_def_state(p_pi) !=
> - ib_port_info_get_link_down_def_state(p_old_pi))
> - send_set = TRUE;
Same as above.
> + ib_port_info_set_port_state(p_pi, port_state);
>
> /* we only change port fields if we do not change state */
> if (port_state == IB_LINK_NO_CHANGE) {
> @@ -358,7 +350,6 @@ __osm_link_mgr_set_physp_pi(IN osm_link_mgr_t * const p_mgr,
> */
> context.pi_context.ignore_errors = FALSE;
>
> - ib_port_info_set_port_state(p_pi, port_state);
> if (port_state != IB_LINK_NO_CHANGE &&
> ib_port_info_get_port_state(p_pi) !=
> ib_port_info_get_port_state(p_old_pi)) {
More information about the general
mailing list