[ofa-general] RE: QoS for iSER

[Sean Hefty]

>> And as you've mentioned, some rules may overlap. For instance,
>> if the rule for all the RDS traffic will appear before the iSER
>> rule, then iSER requests will be caught by the RDS rule.
>
>That doesn't sound so good but I don't see a good alternative here other
>than for this case to put the iSER rule first. The other fallback is the
>more detailed configuration but RDS falls into the generic range
>category which is problematic in terms of this (and can't be
>differentiated by ServiceID unlike the other ULPs).

I'm not overly familiar with the details of RDS, but event if the active side
uses a dynamic service ID, I would expect the passive side to use something well
known.

- Sean