[ofa-general] OFED October 8 meeting summary on OFED 1.3

[Eli Cohen]

> I am talking on the LSO patches, the checksum patches whose related 
> discussion has started but never ended. The LRO patch is problematic and 
> need to be fixed as Eli has agreed.
Adding facilities to disable LRO is not a big problem. As I said, I will
send a patch that does that.

>  Its also pure SW optimization and I 
> don't see why rush to merge it into OFED 1.3.
> 
> As for the interrupt mitigation patches, I have sent some comments and 
> Eli only replied on some of them, nothing was changed or fixed yet, and 
> other then this, no review has been done.
I am not aware that you have more questions about interrupt mitigation.
We even discussed this over the phone so I assumed you don't have more
questions. Anyway, please send any questions you still have.
> 
> This is just my opinion, can be nice to see what others have to say.
> 
> I am referring to these patches under kernel_patches/fixes
> 
> > t_0010_ipoib_high_dma.patch
> > t_0017_ipoib_sg.patch
> > t_0019_hw_csum.patch
> > t_0020_core_csum.patch
> > t_0030_mthca_checksum_offload.patch
> > t_0040_mlx4_checksum_offload.patch
> > t_0050_ipoib_checksum_offload.patch
> > t_0060_ipoib_qp_init_attr.patch
> > t_0080_mlx4_qp_max_msg.patch
> > t_0090_core_lso.patch
> > t_0100_mlx4_lso.patch
> > t_0110_ipoib_lso.patch
> > t_0120_ipoib_ethtool.patch
> > t_0130_ipoib_lro.patch
> > t_0140_core_modify_cq.patch
> > t_0150_mlx4_modify_cq.patch
> > t_0160_ipoib_modify_cq.patch
> > t_0170_cq_coal.patch
> 
> Or.
> 
>