[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] osm: Adding two SA MAD class-specific status values
Sasha Khapyorsky
sashak at voltaire.com
Tue Oct 16 16:35:33 PDT 2007
On 01:32 Wed 17 Oct , Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> Hi Yevgeny,
>
> On 08:57 Tue 16 Oct , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> > Adding two SA MAD class-specific status values:
> > - ERR_REQ_DENIED
> > - ERR_REQ_PRIORITY_SUGGESTED
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn at dev.mellanox.co.il>
> > ---
> > opensm/include/iba/ib_types.h | 2 ++
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/opensm/include/iba/ib_types.h b/opensm/include/iba/ib_types.h
> > index e1785f1..c6f16b9 100644
> > --- a/opensm/include/iba/ib_types.h
> > +++ b/opensm/include/iba/ib_types.h
> > @@ -903,6 +903,8 @@ static inline boolean_t OSM_API ib_class_is_rmpp(IN const uint8_t class_code)
> > #define IB_SA_MAD_STATUS_TOO_MANY_RECORDS (CL_HTON16(0x0400))
> > #define IB_SA_MAD_STATUS_INVALID_GID (CL_HTON16(0x0500))
> > #define IB_SA_MAD_STATUS_INSUF_COMPS (CL_HTON16(0x0600))
> > +#define IB_SA_MAD_STATUS_DENIED (CL_HTON16(0x0700))
> > +#define IB_SA_MAD_STATUS_PRIO_SUGGESTED (CL_HTON16(0x0800))
>
> Where those values are defined? In published by IBTA drafts both are 7
> (STATUS_DENIED in Volume 1 Release 1.2.1 and STATUS_PRIO_SUGGESTED in
> Annex QoS13: QoS Management v0.9).
Never mind - I overlooked that it is already changed in 1.2.1 draft.
Sasha
More information about the general
mailing list