[ewg] Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] osm: bugfix - IB_PR_COMPMASK was used in MPR
Hal Rosenstock
hrosenstock at xsigo.com
Mon Sep 17 05:36:46 PDT 2007
Hi Sasha,
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 22:51 +0300, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 12:25 Mon 10 Sep , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > On 9/10/07, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Hal,
> > >
> > > On 12:13 Mon 10 Sep , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > > > Hi Sasha,
> > > >
> > > > On 9/10/07, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 15:57 Sun 09 Sep , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Sasha,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In several places in MPR implementation IB_PR_COMPMASK_*
> > > > > > was used instead of IB_MPR_COMPMASK_*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn at dev.mellanox.co.il>
> > > > >
> > > > > Applied. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't this also be applied to OFED 1.2 ?
> > >
> > > It does not look for me that any new OFED 1.2x distribution is planned.
> >
> > Seems like this is an EWG issue.
> >
> > Should there be OFED 1.2.x fix release(s) ?
>
> At least I don't know about. In case if there will I could incorporate
> critical fixes from 'master' into 'ofed_1_2' branch.
Your OFED 1.2 branch, right ? Vlad could pick this up if there is to be
an OFED 1.2 fix release.
> For users who prefer
> to use OpenSM separately from OFED I would suggest 'master' anyway.
Master is not as "baked"/tested as OFED 1.2 although it has other
goodies.
> Seems reasonable?
For your part, yes but still haven't heard on EWG. Seems like there is
not much interest there in maintaining OFED 1.2.
-- Hal
> Sasha
> _______________________________________________
> ewg mailing list
> ewg at lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
More information about the general
mailing list