[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] uDAPL 2.0 mods to co-exist with uDAPL 1.2

[James Lentini]

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Arlin Davis wrote:

> > > --- a/test/dtest/dtest.c
> > > +++ b/test/dtest/dtest.c
> > > @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
> > >  #include <inttypes.h>
> > >   #ifndef DAPL_PROVIDER
> > > -#define DAPL_PROVIDER "OpenIB-cma"
> > > +#define DAPL_PROVIDER "OpenIB-2-cma"
> > 
> > Should we update OpenIB to ofa? Obviously, this isn't necessary as part of
> > this change
> 
> I didn't want to change the 1.2 names for compatibility reasons but for 2.0 we
> could move to ofa names for both libraries and provider names. For example,
> libdaplcma.so becomes libdaplofa.so, OpenIB-cma becomes ofa.
> 
> For example dat.conf 2.0 entries would look like this:
> 
> ofa u2.0 nonthreadsafe default libdaplofa.so dapl.2.0 "ib0 0" ""
> ofa-1 u2.0 nonthreadsafe default libdaplofa.so dapl.2.0 "ib1 0" ""
> ofa-2 u2.0 nonthreadsafe default libdaplofa.so dapl.2.0 "ib2 0" ""
> ofa-3 u2.0 nonthreadsafe default libdaplofa.so dapl.2.0 "ib3 0" ""
> ofa-bond u2.0 nonthreadsafe default libdaplofa.so dapl.2.0 "bond0 0" ""
> 
> Is that what you had in mind?

Yes.