[ofa-general] ***SPAM*** uDAPL thread safety

[Dev]

Hi Arlin,

   Please correct me if I'm wrong ! Does that mean that the OFED uDAPL implementation is thread safe for those routines which the spec describes as thread safe but non threadsafe for those routines which the spec states as "provider dependent"?

cheers

/Dev


Arlin Davis <ardavis at ichips.intel.com> wrote: Dev wrote:
> HI,
> Is the uDAPL provider in OFED 1.2 thread safe ? the dat.conf by default 
> has an entry nonthreadsafe and the spec says for some of the routines 
> thread safety depends on the provider.
> 

The underlying OFA provider (openib_cma) and stack (rdma_cma,verbs) are 
all thread safe but according to udat_config.h the reference 
implementation (uDAT,uDAPL common code) is not.

James, can you speak to state of uDAT/uDAPL common code? Is this comment 
still true?

-arlin


       
---------------------------------
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20070928/f4b1fbc2/attachment.html>