[ofa-general] where to report bugs?
Brian J. Murrell
Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM
Fri Apr 4 14:13:42 PDT 2008
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 14:06 -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> So I guess you want something like:
>
> export CPPFLAGS="-I<sandbox_dir>/include"
CPPFLAGS or CFLAGS? I could see it being the former but I used the
latter.
>
> Before you do the configure and build?
That is in effect exactly what I did to deal with this issue. I just
didn't find it very elegant. But if that is how the package is meant to
operate, that is fine. If it were CFLAGS you were promoting the setting
of I would be a bit more sticky because RPM wants to have the CFLAGS for
it's own use:
$ rpm --eval="%configure"
CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:--O2 -g -fmessage-length=0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2}" ; export CFLAGS ;
CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS:--O2 -g -fmessage-length=0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2}" ; export CXXFLAGS ;
FFLAGS="${FFLAGS:--O2 -g -fmessage-length=0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2}" ; export FFLAGS ;
./configure --host=x86_64-suse-linux --build=x86_64-suse-linux \
--target=x86_64-suse-linux \
--program-prefix= \
...
And while, yes, you can override CFLAGS and the %configure macro will
use it, I'd rather defer the CFLAGS to whatever the vendor has put into
the RPM macros file(s).
b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20080404/c7324586/attachment.sig>
More information about the general
mailing list