[ofa-general] Re: Has anyone tried running RDS over 10GE / IWARP NICs ?

[Richard Frank]

This is all goodness -

I'm looking for something specific to what does and does not work with 
IWARP NICs in OFED today - perhaps a matrix comparing functionality of 
IB vs iWARP - so we know what not to do and or what to work around when 
running over IWARP NICS.

For now - we could probably just treat them as simple NICs and run RDS 
over TCP - that ought to at least  work..

Steve Wise wrote:
> iWARP RFCs:
>
>> 5040 A Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol Specification. R. Recio,
>>      B. Metzler, P. Culley, J. Hilland, D. Garcia. October 2007. 
>> (Format:
>>      TXT=142247 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
>>
>> 5041 Direct Data Placement over Reliable Transports. H. Shah, J.
>>      Pinkerton, R. Recio, P. Culley. October 2007. (Format: TXT=84642
>>      bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
>>
>> 5042 Direct Data Placement Protocol (DDP) / Remote Direct Memory
>>      Access Protocol (RDMAP) Security. J. Pinkerton, E. Deleganes. 
>> October
>>      2007. (Format: TXT=127453 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
>>
>> 5043 Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Direct Data Placement
>>      (DDP) Adaptation. C. Bestler, Ed., R. Stewart, Ed.. October 2007.
>>      (Format: TXT=38740 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
>>
>> 5044 Marker PDU Aligned Framing for TCP Specification. P. Culley, U.
>>      Elzur, R. Recio, S. Bailey, J. Carrier. October 2007. (Format:
>>      TXT=168918 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
>>
>> 5045 Applicability of Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol (RDMA) and
>>      Direct Data Placement (DDP). C. Bestler, Ed., L. Coene. October 
>> 2007.
>>      (Format: TXT=51749 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL)
>
> For RDMA over TCP, refer to 5040, 5041, and 5044.
>
> iWARP Verbs:
>
> http://www.rdmaconsortium.org/home/draft-hilland-iwarp-verbs-v1.0-RDMAC.pdf 
>
>
>
> Steve.