[ofa-general] Directions for verbs API extensions

[Tziporet Koren]

Roland Dreier wrote:
> Finally, there are proprietary verbs extensions that are only
> supported by a single device at the moment, which we have to decide if
> and how to support.  It is a tradeoff between making useful features
> available versus making the already overly complex verbs API even more
> impossible to fathom, although it seems all of these have users asking
> for them:
>
>  - ConnectX has XRC, masked atomic operations, and the "block
>    loopback" flag for UD QPs at least.  
We also have reliable multicast feature we wish to add

Tziporet