[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 03 of 12] get_task_mm should not succeed if mmput() is running and has reduced
Christoph Lameter
clameter at sgi.com
Tue Apr 22 16:13:20 PDT 2008
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:23:16PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Missing signoff by you.
>
> I thought I had to signoff if I conributed with anything that could
> resemble copyright? Given I only merged that patch, I can add an
> Acked-by if you like, but merging this in my patchset was already an
> implicit ack ;-).
No you have to include a signoff if the patch goes through your custody
chain. This one did.
Also add a
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter at sgi.com>
somewhere if you want to signify that the patch came from me.
More information about the general
mailing list