[ofa-general] Re: [ PATCH 3/3 ] RDMA/nes SFP+ cleanup

[Roland Dreier]

 > Clean up the SFP+ patch.

Why send a patch and then immediately a cleanup?  Why not just clean the
original patch?

 > -	if ((nesadapter->OneG_Mode) && (nesadapter->phy_type[mac_index] != NES_PHY_TYPE_PUMA_1G)) {
 > +	if ((nesadapter->OneG_Mode) && (nesadapter->phy_type[ mac_index ] != NES_PHY_TYPE_PUMA_1G)) {

This type of change isn't a cleanup... kernel style prefers

	array[index]

to

	array[ index ]

and it seems most of this patch is making the change to the less-good way?

 - R.