[ofa-general] uDAPL private data size issue

[Hefty, Sean]

>I guess that makes the uDAPL cma provider non-compliant unless
>there is a way for rdma_cm to give back some of IB CM request
>private data area.
>
>Sean, is there anything that can be done here?

The cma header is defined as part of the spec, so it won't be changing.  If more private data is needed than what DAPL provides, the IB CM interface can be used directly, or simply exchange the data after connecting.

- Sean