[ofa-general] [PATCH] cma_zero_addr

[Roland Dreier]

 > PATCHv6 is the latest version. Should we use it?

 > http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2008-December/055727.html

 > And it could be nice if cma_zero_addr patch, will be accepted too.

OK, thanks.  What is the final version of the cma_zero_addr() change?  I
do agree it makes sense it makes sense to use ipv6_addr_any() instead of
duplicating the code.  Have you and Sean agreed on it?

 - R.