[ofa-general] [PATCH] opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c: fixing errors in comments
Yevgeny Kliteynik
kliteyn at dev.mellanox.co.il
Wed Dec 17 07:00:54 PST 2008
Hi Sasha,
Following Nicolas' fix, here's some fixes in the fat-tree routing comments.
Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn at dev.mellanox.co.il>
---
opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
index aa51d23..ebe6612 100644
--- a/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
+++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
@@ -2462,11 +2462,11 @@ static void __osm_ftree_fabric_route_to_cns(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree)
* foreach HCA non-CN port in fabric
* obtain the LID of the HCA port
* get switch that is connected to this HCA port
- * set switch LFT(LID) to the port connecting to compute node
- * call assign-down-going-port-by-ascending-up(TRUE,FALSE) on CURRENT switch
+ * set switch LFT(LID) to the port connected to the HCA port
+ * call assign-down-going-port-by-ascending-up(TRUE,TRUE) on the switch
*
- * Routing to these HCAs is routing a REAL hca lid on SECONDARY path.
- * However, we do want to allow load-leveling of the traffic to the non-CNs,
+ * Routing to these HCAs is routing a REAL hca lid on MAIN path.
+ * We want to allow load-leveling of the traffic to the non-CNs,
* because such nodes may include IO nodes with heavy usage
* - we should set fwd tables
* - we should update port counters
--
1.5.1.4
More information about the general
mailing list