[ofa-general] Bugs in opensm/libvendor

[Hal Rosenstock]

Sasha,

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com> wrote:
> Hi Hal,
>
> On 07:35 Thu 18 Dec     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>> >
>> > Also to be fully complaint SGID should be used with SLID/DLID query. This
>> > likely will require API change and could be handled as different patch.
>>
>> Isn't there an OpenSM change needed as well ?
>
> I'm not sure. Basically OpenSM works correctly - it just doesn't reject
> non-complaint queries. I think we could preserve this "extension".

IMO in order to preserve this extended feature which is used in
various places currently, the treatment of num_paths = 127 needs to be
changed to how not supplying this component is currently handled.

-- Hal

> Sasha
>