***SPAM*** Re: [ofa-general] Bugs in opensm/libvendor

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak at voltaire.com> wrote:
> On 08:35 Thu 18 Dec     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>
>> IMO in order to preserve this extended feature which is used in
>> various places currently, the treatment of num_paths = 127 needs to be
>> changed to how not supplying this component is currently handled.
>
> Are you saying we need to return potentially more than 127 paths even if
> num_paths = 127 was specified explicitly? I don't think that this is a good idea.

I thought that was your proposal in order not to change the API for this.

I also thought you "liked" the extensions provided by OpenSM.

> Assuming you care about breaking backward compatibility

Don't you ?

> where this osm_vendor_sa API (OSMV_QUERY_PATH_REC_BY_*) is used today?

saquery and osmtest.

-- Hal

> Sasha
>