[ofw] RE: [ofa-general] PATCH[2/6] Windows port of libibmad - dump.c

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Sean Hefty <sean.hefty at intel.com> wrote:
>>Sasha has written some comments on the general list indicating that
>>libibcommon may disappear in the future. It could be combined with
>>libibumad (as libibmad (and diags) both use it.
>
> I'd much rather see it integrated with libibmad than libibumad.  libibumad is
> fairly self-contained as the interface into the kernel.

That's fine as long as things that use libibumad don't now require
libibmad as an additional dependency for something that was in
libibcommon. I don't know if there's anything like that. xdump
wouldn't cause that. I haven't looked at the rest of libibcommon and
the implications.

-- Hal

> - Sean
>
>