[ofa-general] OFED Jan-07, 2008 meeting summary on readiness toward RC2
Steve Wise
swise at opengridcomputing.com
Wed Jan 9 06:15:07 PST 2008
Tziporet Koren wrote:
> OFED Jan-07, 2008 meeting summary on readiness toward RC2
>
> 1. Release status:
> * In general there are no major issues - testing continue at all
> companies
> * There is a wide coverage of platform and OSes
>
> 2. Tasks that should be completed for RC2:
> * XRC - enhanced API - will be ready by next week
> * IPoIB performance improvements for small messages - at least
> some of the changes will be integrated
> * Open MPI 1.2.5-rc2 - will be ready by next week
> * Qlogic new driver - done
>
> 3. Agree on new schedule for the release:
> * RC2: Jan 15, 2008
> * RC3: Jan 29, 2008
> * RC4: Feb 12, 2008
> * Release: Feb 19, 2008
>
> If we will see that RC3 is stable enough we will try to pull-in
> And in any case we do not want to delay the release any more
>
> 4. Review critical and major bugs:
> 750 critical raisch at de.ibm.com Problem with modprobe ib_ehca
> with older kernel versions
> - probably fixed
> 760 major eli at mellanox.co.il UDP performance on Rx is lower
> than Tx
> - related to IPoIB above
> 761 major eli at mellanox.co.il Poor and jittery UDP performance
> at small messages
> - related to IPoIB above
> 820 major pasha at mellanox.co.il rpm 4.4.2.2, Binary file matches
> Binary file
> - patch was sent by OSU will be incorporated by Pasha
> 800 major perkinjo at cse.ohio-state.edu MVAPICH2 compile error
> on PPC64
> - fixed
> 736 major rolandd at cisco.com IBV_WC_RETRY_EXC_ERR errors with
> local rdma_reads
> - Need Arlin to retest with new FW
> 767 major swise at opengridcomputing.com Non backport Kernels
> that don't build in genalloc compile errors for cxgb3
> - not a major issue (will be in RN)
>
>
I'm beginning to think I should really fix this. I had another customer
hit this issue today. The fix, however, is to _always_ build the
genpool backport into the ib_core module. Is that a reasonable fix?
I'd basically move the genpool backport patch into kernel_patches/fixes
so it always gets applied... Thoughts?
More information about the general
mailing list