[ofa-general] [PATCH 14/16] ib/ipoib: Support modifying IPOIB CQ moderation params

[Or Gerlitz]

Eli Cohen wrote:
> Thinking it over , if I want to make the code correct as it is now (e.g.
> a single cq for both tx and rx), I must require that the user supply
> both tx and rx values in each invocation of ethtool and that these
> values be identical. Alternatively we can say that rx dictates
> configuration for both rx and tx. When we get separate tx and rx CQs 
> I will modify this patch to exclude tx configuration.


my vote is for having the rx dictating the configuration and excluding 
the tx handling, but if you want to have it now and remove it later, 
that's fine.

Or.