[ewg] RE: [ofa-general] OFED Jan 14 meeting summary on RC2readiness

[Roland Dreier]

 > > I guess you mean just implement XRC without allowing multiple
 > > processes to share an XRC domain?  That actually seems like a sensible
 > > thing to implement as well...
 > 
 > This is part of the current XRC implementation -- just give -1 as the fd value
 > in ibv_open_xrc_domain().

I *think* Gleb's point was that the XRC implementation could be much
simpler if this were the *only* case supported -- you wouldn't need
all the complexity of kernel receive QPs etc I guess.  Gleb, is that
what you meant?