[ofa-general] RE: [Scst-devel] [Stgt-devel] Performance of SCST versus STGT
Sufficool, Stanley
ssufficool at rov.sbcounty.gov
Thu Jan 24 08:36:21 PST 2008
Can I surmise from all this benchmarking of the ib_srpt module that this
is now stable? Last I checked the git version still had a data
corruption bug.
I saw some patches submitted to fix this, but the OFED git repository
(http://www.openfabrics.org/git/~vu/srpt.git) shows no recent commits.
With all these impressive numbers, I am eager to see SRPT/SCST
performance in the WinOF srp initiator environment using database loads.
Props to Vu and Vlad for this outstanding storage transport!
On Jan 24, 2008 8:06 AM, Robin Humble <robin.humble+stgt at anu.edu.au>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:32:08PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >
>
>.......................................................................
......................
> >. . STGT read SCST read . STGT
read SCST read .
> >. . performance performance .
performance performance .
> >. . (0.5K, MB/s) (0.5K, MB/s) . (1 MB
>MB/s) (1 MB, MB/s) .
>
>.......................................................................
......................
> >. Ethernet (1 Gb/s network) . 77 78 .
77 89 .
> >. IPoIB (8 Gb/s network) . 163 185 .
201 239 .
> >. iSER (8 Gb/s network) . 250 N/A .
360 N/A .
> >. SRP (8 Gb/s network) . N/A 421 .
N/A 683 .
> >.....................................................................
> >.......................
>
Results with /dev/ram0 configured as backing store on the target
(buffered I/O):
Read Write Read Write
performance performance performance
performance
(0.5K, MB/s) (0.5K, MB/s) (1 MB, MB/s) (1 MB,
MB/s)
STGT + iSER 250 48 349 781
SCST + SRP 411 66 659 746
Results with /dev/ram0 configured as backing store on the target (direct
I/O):
Read Write Read Write
performance performance performance
performance
(0.5K, MB/s) (0.5K, MB/s) (1 MB, MB/s) (1 MB,
MB/s)
STGT + iSER 7.9 9.8 589 647
SCST + SRP 12.3 9.7 811 794
Bart.
More information about the general
mailing list