[ofa-general] Issues with osm_lin_fwd_tbl.h:osm_lin_fwd_tbl_get_lids_per_block()
Vincent Ficet
jean-vincent.ficet at bull.net
Wed Jul 9 06:37:57 PDT 2008
Hello,
The function osm_lin_fwd_tbl.h:osm_lin_fwd_tbl_get_lids_per_block() is
coded as follows:
static inline uint16_t
osm_lin_fwd_tbl_get_lids_per_block(IN const osm_lin_fwd_tbl_t * const p_tbl)
{
UNUSED_PARAM(p_tbl);
return (64);
}
Given that the block used comes from the 'data' (payload) field of the
ib_smp_t structure (defined in opensm/include/iba/ib_types.h) which is:
uint8_t data[IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE];
where IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE is defined as:
#define IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE 64
Shouldn't osm_lin_fwd_tbl_get_lids_per_block() be implemented as follows:
{
UNUSED_PARAM(p_tbl);
return IB_SMP_DATA_SIZE;
}
Also, a LID beeing 16 bit wide, the function name is rather misleading
if not wrong:
In actual fact, it should rather be called
osm_lin_fwd_tbl_get_ports_per_block(), since output ports are encoded as
uint8_t in osm_lin_fwd_tbl.h:
typedef struct osm_lin_fwdbl {
uint16_t size;
uint8_t port_tbl[1];
} osm_lin_fwd_tbl_t;
I think the confusion here is the same as a previous issue I raised in
commit a4934944004586759b3519afa71db5fddebb6541
Do you agree ? If so, I can post a patch if you wish.
Finally, what is the point in keeping the unused parameter p_tbl ?
Thanks for your help,
Vincent
More information about the general
mailing list