[ofa-general][PATCH v2 1/2]mlx4: Multiple completion vectors support

Roland Dreier rdreier at cisco.com
Wed Jun 4 21:12:41 PDT 2008


 > I resent the two patches that handle multiple completion vectors last week.
 > What is the status for these patches? Are there further changes that need to be done,
 > or will these patches be applied?

I guess the patches look mostly OK, but are there any results that give
motivation for applying this?  I'm not asking about "multicore systems
need multiple EQs so we should do this" level of vagueness, but "we have
application and/or ULP X that shows improvement Z using this."  Also any
thoughts on how an app/ULP can sanely choose which vector to use?

 - R.



More information about the general mailing list