[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] opensm: preserve base lid routes

[Sasha Khapyorsky]

On 06:05 Thu 12 Jun     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > > 
> > > Right but why is OK to disrupt non base LID traffic but not base LID
> > > traffic ? Is it only because it's only being used by one ULP
> > > currrently ?
> > 
> > How this disrupt non base LID traffic more than it was now?
> 
> I didn't say that. I was asking why it's OK for non base LID traffic but
> not base LID traffic.

Then I likely don't understand your question. What are you asking "why
base LID preservation is useful"? I think I answered this already.

> Isn't it that's it's many ULPs rather than just
> MPI ?

I don't see how the whole issue is related to MPI/non-MPI.

Sasha