[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] IB/uverbs: BKL is not needed for ib_uverbs_open()

[Roland Dreier]

 > That's the general idea: audit the code where the BKL appears and
 > remove it when it's safe to do so.  It's always an appropriate time;
 > the only question is whether you think this change is good to go into
 > the tree for 2.6.27, or whether it should hang out in linux-next for
 > one more cycle.  I would assume that the extra time would not be
 > necessary.

Yes, this change should be good to go for 2.6.27.

Thanks,
  Roland