[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] mmu notifiers #v8

[Avi Kivity]

Jack Steiner wrote:
> The range invalidates have a performance advantage for the GRU. TLB invalidates
> on the GRU are relatively slow (usec) and interfere somewhat with the performance
> of other active GRU instructions. Invalidating a large chunk of addresses with
> a single GRU TLBINVAL operation is must faster than issuing a stream of single
> page TLBINVALs.
>
> I expect this performance advantage will also apply to other users of mmuops.
>   

In theory this would apply to kvm as well (coalesce tlb flush IPIs, 
lookup shadow page table once), but is it really a fast path?  What 
triggers range operations for your use cases?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function